The crime of the century

Notice:

Prairie Fire Newspaper went on hiatus after the publication of the September 2015 issue. It may return one of these days but until then we will continue to host all of our archived content for your reading pleasure. Many of the articles have held up well over the years. Please contact us if you have any questions, thoughts, or an interest in helping return Prairie Fire to production. We can also be found on Facebook and Twitter. Thank you to all our readers, contributors, and supporters - the quality of Prairie Fire was a reflection of how many people it touched (touches).

By Richard Lamm

I have just participated in the greatest embezzlement in all of history. In my seventy-plus years, I have never seen such a perfect crime. Like most other master criminals, I am heady with success and feel a need to brag. I kid you not—never before has one group appropriated as much money that belonged to another group in the history of crime. The victims, while they are increasingly suspicious, still do not know they have been had. It was literally and figuratively as easy as taking candy out of the mouths of babies.

Here is how we did it. The first rule of embezzlement is to find some naive patsy. We sensed 40 years ago the younger generation was not paying enough attention to public policy, so we quietly found ways to maintain our lifestyle and charge it to the next generation. While those of you under 45 were preoccupied with other things, my generation dumped the largest load of debt on you that history has ever seen — and found ways to maintain our lifestyles on your credit cards.

A good scam needs a compassionate come-on. In our case, we developed a new word: “poor elderly.” To this day, most Americans do not understand that this is actually two words, and that “poor” no longer adequately describes the elderly as a class. There are, of course, poor elderly, many of them; but as a class the elderly have the most discretionary income of any group in America (except those in the age bracket of 55–65).

Next, we devised a number of systems that allowed us to charge our retirement to the next generation of Americans, who will wake up to find they are on the losing side of a Ponzi scheme. Like all good con artists, we relied on “trust.” We told them there was a “trust” fund for both Social Security and Medicare. Of course, this was a lie. There is no “trust” fund, in the normal sense of the word, because we take this month’s Social Security taxes from today’s workers and pay them to today’s elderly.

Then, we tell today’s workers not to worry—the money is being held “in trust.” In actual fact (as Sen. Ernest Hollings of South Carolina has observed), they would be no better off if the fund was invested in Confederate war bonds. The trust fund is a sham because it only contains IOU’s that tomorrow’s generation of workers will have to (mostly) pay off themselves. They will have to pay for both our retirement and a good part of their own. Not bad. We succeeded in taking money from poor workers in St. Paul and sent it to wealthy retirees in St. Petersburg—and no one was the wiser. But, I have hardly begun.

The perfect embezzlement maximizes its take. We soon found there was money left over after paying the Social Security funds to today’s elderly, and we did not want to stop halfway. What self-respecting crook would leave money lying in the bank vault after a robbery? Hell no. We completed the job by something called the “consolidated budget.” This allowed us to quietly take the Social Security funds left over to reduce our taxes by spending the money on current government services. Under the “consolidated budget,” we could legally “borrow” the money in the “trust fund” left over every year and spend it on current government services, thereby reducing our yearly taxes.

Virtually every year for the last 40 years we understated the yearly deficit and understated the total federal debt. Even though the official federal debt is approximately $9.5 trillion, the amount actually passed on to the next generation is closer to $50 trillion. My generation are master embezzlers. The entire scheme was done with clever accounting gimmicks, which allowed us to minimize our taxes and maximize our spending while we passed the bill on to the next generation. Like many victims of a crime, by the time they figure it out I will be long gone.

I have completely and totally spent the Social Security Trust Fund and left nothing in trust, absolutely nothing, for today’s workers to pay future obligations. They will have to either raise their taxes substantially or dramatically reduce their benefits under the system. They have no other practical alternatives. They may, of course, try to do the same thing that my generation did and try to perpetrate the Ponzi scheme, but I doubt it will work. Young people catch on at some point. The true perfect crime only works once.

Every dime of the war in Iraq we put on our kid’s credit cards. Every dime of Katrina and Rita hurricane recovery we put “off-budget” and thus left it to our children to pay. Then we voted ourselves a substantial tax cut, the only tax cut during a war in our national history. If anyone quoted Milton Friedman—“If you cut taxes without cutting spending, you are not cutting taxes, you are deferring them to your children”—we would quickly say we were “stimulating the economy” and change the subject.

The next generation will wake up to the magnitude of the fraud. They will recognize they are working long hours (or two jobs) and make less working than I make in retirement. Yet every month they transfer money to me to pay for my health benefits. I have plans for that, also. When they start to blow the whistle, I will say with shock and horror, “You can’t start an intergenerational war.” I will tell them about how hard I fought for this country (six months in active service, most of it at the officer’s club bar). I will shame them by accusing them of breaking the “generational compact,” neatly covering the fact that it was really my generation who broke the compact by leaving them an unsustainable and insolvent system. Like any successful crook, I cover all my bases.

When health-care costs became a larger factor in our budgets, we found a system to subsidize our health-care costs at the expense of following generations. We called it Medicare. The average senior who turned 65 in 2000 got back $4 from today’s workers for every $1 that he or she paid into the system. Today’s retiree receives on the average a $100,000 subsidy toward his health care costs—from a system that is slated to go broke not far into this century. I am looking forward to playing golf and living high and sending much of the bill to today’s workers, who make less working full time than I make in retirement. Après moi, le deluge.

The story does not end there. My generation screwed up the savings and loan industry. What did we do to get out of it? We issued 30-year bonds! Why should I pay for my mistakes when there is a gullible generation right behind me? Will I be here in 30 years? No. Will you? I leave it to my kids to pay off.

My wife and I bought our first house in 1963 for $11,900. Our first mortgage payments were $49 a month because we had a VA loan subsidized by the federal government. Everyone in my generation could buy his or her own home. It is estimated that 30 percent of the current workers below age 30 will never be able to own their own houses. It does not end there. I, to this day, get more money in housing allowance every year from the federal government than the poorest American. It is simple. I get to deduct my mortgage interest and real estate taxes, which is worth more to someone in my income bracket than the cash equivalent that any poor person in my state receives for housing. Ditto health benefits. By not taxing my health insurance paid for by my employer, I also receive more health benefits from the federal government than most poor children on Medicaid. I have recently passed Medicare Part D to help pay for my prescriptions. I have never seen a benefit that couldn’t be enriched.

Do I feel guilty? Well, occasionally. The other night I was standing in line for the movies, getting a senior citizen discount. There was a struggling young couple in front of me who were wondering how they were going to pay the babysitter. My wife and I had driven to the theater in our fancy foreign car from our debt-free house—but we got a $6 discount from the price the young couple paid.

I try not to spend too much time thinking about it. I keep busy. Right now, I have to go down to the state legislature to lobby for free fishing licenses for seniors. Why not? We already get free state park admission. See you around.

 

In our September issue, we plan to explore some options to fix what Governor Lamm obviously feels is a major problem in the United States.

Comments

Submitted by David Goldsmith... (not verified) on

It's such a shame that this system continues to eat the nation for the longest time. It's already deeply rooted within our governmental system. It's even probable that the private sector is also a great force behind this system. No wonder, we are all reaping now what they sowed (and continuing to sow). Great. Just great.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

Sir, You forgot the cities that ran to the Federal Government because so many people were moving out of the cities with high property taxes to subdivisions. The Cities demaned their State Senators do something to help. Instead of working to lower the property taxes and improve the communities in the cities they gave themselve raises and their friends in business high dollar contracts without bothering to list for bids to out of townor out of state contractors. Their buddies at the Federal Government came up with a plan. The low cost loans program for people to buy and remodel the old homes in cities would support housing prices and get people back into those really old homes and paying taxes again. Problem solved right ? Well along comes the greedy. They exploit these letter of the law meant to save poor neighorhoods with low cost home loans and apply those home loans to high dollar Golf Course Gated Communites. They made loans on homes that were not even built. Some devolpers got loans for 20 to 30 homes and had only built one in the subdivision. These greedy so and so's would send out their own property appraisers, not a local yokal as they call them, who would overalue the homes someone wanted to buy as much as $130,000.00 over what it might bring in the real world. This Collusion was compounded when these loan makers like Country Wide sold the loans in high dollar bunldes to investors. The fraud in the package made the investors think that the buyers of these homes walked into INSTANT Equity or $100,000.00 or more just signing the loan. They distract the public by screaming lies about Fannie and Freddie who at the time only held 4 % in bad loans on their books. Which is way below the national average. Little did the public know that Fannie and Freddie were not buying these loans but hedge funds and private investors were. Fannie and Freddie would actually go out and look at the homes and make sure they exist, that the loans value is fair, and there is an actual homeowner. The people writting these bad loans did not want anyone checking their true value so they sold them at a little discount claiming they needed to move they fast. So the greed created addicts all the way to wall street. Many non citizens are now surfacing who got home loans on property no one was selling and they left the country. Homeowners come home from a vaction to find someone sold their home and the buyer had gotten money and left the country. All this in one week.

Immigration in Nebraska